Read this before you over-invest in the latest tech platform, decide to lease rather than buy that new computer, or expect to resell your smartwatc ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quod quidem iam fit etiam in Academia. Qui autem diffidet perpetuitati bonorum suorum, timeat necesse est, ne aliquando amissis illis sit miser. Itaque nostrum est-quod nostrum dico, artis est-ad ea principia, quae accepimus. At ille pellit, qui permulcet sensum voluptate. Quo modo autem philosophus loquitur? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Ut aliquid scire se gaudeant? Non enim quaero quid verum, sed quid cuique dicendum sit.
Sed ea mala virtuti magnitudine obruebantur. Is ita vivebat, ut nulla tam exquisita posset inveniri voluptas, qua non abundaret. Indicant pueri, in quibus ut in speculis natura cernitur. Sed quot homines, tot sententiae; Hoc simile tandem est? Stulti autem malorum memoria torquentur, sapientes bona praeterita grata recordatione renovata delectant. Nescio quo modo praetervolavit oratio. Qua ex cognitione facilior facta est investigatio rerum occultissimarum.
Illa videamus, quae a te de amicitia dicta sunt. Etenim nec iustitia nec amicitia esse omnino poterunt, nisi ipsae per se expetuntur. Cum salvum esse flentes sui respondissent, rogavit essentne fusi hostes. Tenesne igitur, inquam, Hieronymus Rhodius quid dicat esse summum bonum, quo putet omnia referri oportere? Ut placet, inquit, etsi enim illud erat aptius, aequum cuique concedere. Et quidem saepe quaerimus verbum Latinum par Graeco et quod idem valeat;
- Consider leasing tech.
A common application of Moore’s Law for many individuals and ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ab hoc autem quaedam non melius quam veteres, quaedam omnino relicta. Haec quo modo conveniant, non sane intellego. Deinde prima illa, quae in congressu solemus: Quid tu, inquit, huc? Sapientem locupletat ipsa natura, cuius divitias Epicurus parabiles esse docuit. Illum mallem levares, quo optimum atque humanissimum virum, Cn.
An quod ita callida est, ut optime possit architectari voluptates? Polemoni et iam ante Aristoteli ea prima visa sunt, quae paulo ante dixi. Ergo in gubernando nihil, in officio plurimum interest, quo in genere peccetur. Quarum ambarum rerum cum medicinam pollicetur, luxuriae licentiam pollicetur. Addidisti ad extremum etiam indoctum fuisse. Sed nunc, quod agimus;
Zenonis est, inquam, hoc Stoici. Quae autem natura suae primae institutionis oblita est? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Nondum autem explanatum satis, erat, quid maxime natura vellet. Tamen aberramus a proposito, et, ne longius, prorsus, inquam, Piso, si ista mala sunt, placet.
Moore’s Law is not a law in a scientific sense, more an observation and predictive mental model. To that end, some have argued that it is self-fulfilling, with companies feeling the need to keep up with Moore’s law — though that seems like less of a limitation and more of a complement.
Causal relationships aside, many argue that Moore’s Law is coming to its end because of the challenges to build smaller circuits, as the amount of energy needed to cool down the transistors will become larger than the amount of energy already passing through the transistor.
However, that has been a point of debate when taking Moore’s Law as a loose definition of exponential growth. While computers won’t necessarily improve in the ways Moore originally referenced, advancements in cloud computing, quantum physics and the internet of things are likely to create other forms or rapid development.
Your USB stick vs Apollo 11 mainframe computer.
It’s not just your smartphone that is more powerful than the old supercomputers, this ZME Science article notes that even a USB stick or WiFi router is technically more powerful than the 1969 mainframe computers used to guide the first rocket to the moon.
The reducing cost of technology.
Jerrold Siegel from the University of Missouri, notes in this article that: “A computer chip that contained 2,000 transistors and cost $1,000 in 1970, $500 in 1972, $250 in 1974, and $0.97 in 1990 costs less than $0.02 to manufacture today A personal computer that cost $3,000 in 1990, $1,500 in 1992, and $750 in 1994 would now cost about $5.”
Moore’s law is a model used to understand the rapid development of technology.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave Moore’s law into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Compounding: to understand the exponential growth element of Moore’s law.
- Red queen effect: understanding the pace of movement in the broader industry.
Complementary models:
- Zawinski’s law: in understanding expectations for faster development of broad solutions.
- Opportunity cost: to consider the alternative costs of commiting to technology solutions without a view to their potential obsolescence in the medium term.
- The Lindy effect: perhaps a counter to the wisdom that past time can predict future longevity.
This law was inspired by Gordon Moore, co-founder of Fairchild Semiconductor and CEO of Intel. He made the observation in 1965 when he projected the rate of growth for another decade and has expressed surprise at how long the phenomena has persisted.
Find out more in Moore's Law: The Life of Gordon Moore, Silicon Valley's Quiet Revolutionary by Arnold Thackray, David Brock, and Rachel Jones.
Also, consider whether some have been too quick to claim that Moore’s law is dead by viewing this in-depth opinion piece in Venture Beat.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”