0 saved
7.1K views
Which of the following options are more effective? 'ModelThinkers is a growing collection of the big ideas from the big disciplines ... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. An est aliquid per se ipsum flagitiosum, etiamsi nulla comitetur infamia? Si quicquam extra virtutem habeatur in bonis. Nulla profecto est, quin suam vim retineat a primo ad extremum. Tum Torquatus: Prorsus, inquit, assentior; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Cum autem in quo sapienter dicimus, id a primo rectissime dicitur. Multoque hoc melius nos veriusque quam Stoici. Optime, inquam. Iubet igitur nos Pythius Apollo noscere nosmet ipsos. Quae cum essent dicta, discessimus. Ut optime, secundum naturam affectum esse possit. Non igitur potestis voluptate omnia dirigentes aut tueri aut retinere virtutem. Re mihi non aeque satisfacit, et quidem locis pluribus. Haec quo modo conveniant, non sane intellego. Quamquam id quidem licebit iis existimare, qui legerint. Sed ne, dum huic obsequor, vobis molestus sim. Huic mori optimum esse propter desperationem sapientiae, illi propter spem vivere. Piso igitur hoc modo, vir optimus tuique, ut scis, amantissimus. Non potes, nisi retexueris illa. Quid enim me prohiberet Epicureum esse, si probarem, quae ille diceret? Positum est a nostris in iis esse rebus, quae secundum naturam essent, non dolere; Tum mihi Piso: Quid ergo? At quicum ioca seria, ut dicitur, quicum arcana, quicum occulta omnia? Itaque et manendi in vita et migrandi ratio omnis iis rebus, quas supra dixi, metienda. Quamquam non negatis nos intellegere quid sit voluptas, sed quid ille dicat.
- Understand how you currently describe your offer
Do you currently list features or benefits in your mark ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed tamen enitar et, si minus multa mihi occurrent, non fugiam ista popularia. Vide ne ista sint Manliana vestra aut maiora etiam, si imperes quod facere non possim. Dolor ergo, id est summum malum, metuetur semper, etiamsi non aderit; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Habes, inquam, Cato, formam eorum, de quibus loquor, philosophorum. An hoc usque quaque, aliter in vita? Cum ageremus, inquit, vitae beatum et eundem supremum diem, scribebamus haec. Et ais, si una littera commota sit, fore tota ut labet disciplina. Bonum incolumis acies: misera caecitas.
Quamquam id quidem, infinitum est in hac urbe; Virtutis, magnitudinis animi, patientiae, fortitudinis fomentis dolor mitigari solet. Et adhuc quidem ita nobis progresso ratio est, ut ea duceretur omnis a prima commendatione naturae. Atqui, inquam, Cato, si istud optinueris, traducas me ad te totum licebit. Quod si ita sit, cur opera philosophiae sit danda nescio. Iam quae corporis sunt, ea nec auctoritatem cum animi partibus, comparandam et cognitionem habent faciliorem. Duarum enim vitarum nobis erunt instituta capienda.
Certe non potest. Eodem modo is enim tibi nemo dabit, quod, expetendum sit, id esse laudabile. Quo invento omnis ab eo quasi capite de summo bono et malo disputatio ducitur. Expressa vero in iis aetatibus, quae iam confirmatae sunt. Ampulla enim sit necne sit, quis non iure optimo irrideatur, si laboret? Quia nec honesto quic quam honestius nec turpi turpius. Quid, si non sensus modo ei sit datus, verum etiam animus hominis? Et nemo nimium beatus est;
There are many variables to take into consideration when choosing between features and benefits to market your product: product type, market saturation, competition, the focus on customer relationship or on solving a customer’s problem, and so on. While leading with benefits is normally the correct play, there are exceptions, particularly for a highly informed consumer or highly competitive and consistent market.
Another limitation of this approach is the inherent risk of targeting benefits. A feature can potentially be interpreted by different audience segments with different needs — so several groups might find relevance and appeal in a feature.
By contrast, a benefit tends to be a targeted message that can exclude as many people as it targets. This relates to the key takeaway of market research and understanding your audience.
Slack - killing meetings.
Slack is now being challenged by Teams and other competitors but for a time was one of the fastest-growing platform solutions in the world. Rather than focusing on features, their marketing messages highlighted specific data on how companies who adopted their solution reduced emails and meetings — two huge pain points in the corporate world.
iPod - 1,000s of songs.
When iPods launched they famously avoided ads which emphasised their (at the time) impressive storage capacity. Instead, they focused on the opportunity to have ‘thousands of songs in your pocket’.
Unboxing videos
By contrast to the examples above, the growing popularity of unboxing videos on Youtube reflects an appetite for feature-focused discussions for some products.
Features vs benefits is a fundamental mental model in the field of marketing and communication. It can be used more broadly to influence and explain value in any context.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave features vs benefits into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Cost-benefit analysis: in establishing the actual value for a customer or target group.
- Opportunity cost: in establishing the next best value.
- Value proposition: providing clear benefits to customers.
- Personas: to fully understand your customers.
Complementary models:
- Inversion: consider how to deliver pain or make a problem worse to test out the real value of a benefit.
- The golden circle: identify the ‘why’ behind the features to solve underlying value-driven problems.
- Red queen effect: competing on features alone is considered to be a ‘race to the bottom’, as it focuses on value and features. Benefits can provide a broader, sometimes emotional connection with new market opportunities.
- Lock-in effect: how to reduce attrition by delivering on benefits.
- Diversification: testing whether a specific product feature can fulfil multiple benefits from diverse audience segments.
- The BCG growth-share matrix: when considering marketing and market share.
- The 4Ps of marketing: when developing a marketing strategy.
- A/B testing: to test hypotheses about possible benefits and marketing language.
The Features vs Benefits mental model has been a cornerstone of marketing conversations for decades. There are many useful articles in this space, we particularly enjoyed this one from Vappingo which outlines over 100 examples of features vs benefits.
My Notes
-
1381 days ago arun , CoFounder ModelThinkers & keynote speakerThis is an undervalued model outside of sales. I use it in business pitches, conversations and presentations. Even in parenting frankly.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.