0 saved
9.6K views
When applied broadly, an understanding of Entropy and The Second Law of Thermodynamics helps explain the passa ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. At certe gravius. Graecis hoc modicum est: Leonidas, Epaminondas, tres aliqui aut quattuor;
Iam id ipsum absurdum, maximum malum neglegi. Illud urgueam, non intellegere eum quid sibi dicendum sit, cum dolorem summum malum esse dixerit. Ergo ita: non posse honeste vivi, nisi honeste vivatur? Sed tu istuc dixti bene Latine, parum plane. Ac ne plura complectar-sunt enim innumerabilia-, bene laudata virtus voluptatis aditus intercludat necesse est. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Habent enim et bene longam et satis litigiosam disputationem.
Sit sane ista voluptas. Ergo instituto veterum, quo etiam Stoici utuntur, hinc capiamus exordium. Quid affers, cur Thorius, cur Caius Postumius, cur omnium horum magister, Orata, non iucundissime vixerit? Quae cum magnifice primo dici viderentur, considerata minus probabantur. Tu autem inter haec tantam multitudinem hominum interiectam non vides nec laetantium nec dolentium? Quis contra in illa aetate pudorem, constantiam, etiamsi sua nihil intersit, non tamen diligat? Illum mallem levares, quo optimum atque humanissimum virum, Cn. Isto modo ne improbos quidem, si essent boni viri.
- View everything as organised energy, that is decaying and dispersing.
Viewing ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. At ille pellit, qui permulcet sensum voluptate. Aliena dixit in physicis nec ea ipsa, quae tibi probarentur; Immo vero, inquit, ad beatissime vivendum parum est, ad beate vero satis. Haec bene dicuntur, nec ego repugno, sed inter sese ipsa pugnant. Itaque hic ipse iam pridem est reiectus; Sed tamen enitar et, si minus multa mihi occurrent, non fugiam ista popularia.
Quae hic rei publicae vulnera inponebat, eadem ille sanabat. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Si qua in iis corrigere voluit, deteriora fecit. Tu autem, si tibi illa probabantur, cur non propriis verbis ea tenebas? Expectoque quid ad id, quod quaerebam, respondeas. Quarum ambarum rerum cum medicinam pollicetur, luxuriae licentiam pollicetur. Eadem nunc mea adversum te oratio est. Ex eorum enim scriptis et institutis cum omnis doctrina liberalis, omnis historia. Tu enim ista lenius, hic Stoicorum more nos vexat.
Nam et complectitur verbis, quod vult, et dicit plane, quod intellegam; Quae sequuntur igitur? Certe nihil nisi quod possit ipsum propter se iure laudari. Ergo instituto veterum, quo etiam Stoici utuntur, hinc capiamus exordium. Cupiditates non Epicuri divisione finiebat, sed sua satietate. Rapior illuc, revocat autem Antiochus, nec est praeterea, quem audiamus. Haec quo modo conveniant, non sane intellego. Illud non continuo, ut aeque incontentae.
From a scientific point of view, there are some supposed challenges to The Second Law from quantum physics — but to be honest, we still don’t understand those challenges and the associated ongoing debate, which you can explore more in this 2017 Scientific American article.
In truth, we find a more interesting exploration of limitations via how you might use these models as a guide in your broader work and life. From that perspective, you might consider how the application of this model assumes that things decay, rather than change. That is, when applied to businesses, products, or relationships, rather than assuming decay, it might be more useful to assume change — that those elements will continue to evolve and shift which might or might not result in greater disorder. Though the pull towards disorder is still a compelling explanation for countless situations.
The steam engine.
It’s no coincidence that The Laws of Thermodynamics arose during the Industrial Revolution and the birth of the steam engine. The steam engine, at a basic level, has three components — a hot energy source (steam); a device that converts that heat energy into movement (pistons); and a vent that extracts energy that hasn’t been used as heat (a cold sink).
The need for the cold sink demonstrated that when heat was converted to movement, some of the heat was transferred into the system’s surroundings. This was an indicator that for energy to move from a high-temperature body to a low body one that work, or additional energy, was required.
The ice swan.
Imagine an ice sculpture of a swan sitting in an ocean. The sculpture might have incredible detail and artistry, meanwhile, the water around it has undefinable depths. Which do you think has more Entropy?
If you answered with the ocean, you’d be right. The ice sculpture is an ordered and defined object in comparison to the dispersed, random, and dare we say ‘disordered’ state of the water molecules in the ocean. The Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that, without intervention, there is a greater probability that water molecules will organise themselves in the form of an ocean than that of an ice sculpted swan as a result.
Your bedroom.
A common analogy to explain Entropy is that of your messy bedroom. There are more ways your bedroom can be messy, than ways it could be clean and ordered. In that sense, your messy bedroom has high Entropy, and the Second Law would imply that it will tend towards that state if left unchecked.
,
As described in the In Practice section, the field of Thermodynamics was born from the Industrial Revolution and the invention of the steam engine. As with all such ideas, there were many contributors to the field, but French physicist Sadi Carnot was certainly seen as one of the leading thinkers in the space. His discussion of ‘thermodynamic efficiency’ was far ahead of its time.
Rudolf Clausius, working independently in the early 1850s, posited similar ideas after examining how heat from a heated body would flow to one of a lower temperature. He laid the groundwork for the Second Law by explaining: “heat does not pass from a body at low temperature to one at high temperature without an accompanying change elsewhere.”
The origins of these models are generally attributed to Clausius, though it could be rightly argued that Carnot had just as much, if not more, right to claim the mantle.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.