0 saved
6.9K views
When applied broadly, an understanding of Entropy and The Second Law of Thermodynamics helps explain the passa ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Et ille ridens: Video, inquit, quid agas; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Causa autem fuit huc veniendi ut quosdam hinc libros promerem. Quid igitur dubitamus in tota eius natura quaerere quid sit effectum? Sed eum qui audiebant, quoad poterant, defendebant sententiam suam. Quae ista amicitia est? Serpere anguiculos, nare anaticulas, evolare merulas, cornibus uti videmus boves, nepas aculeis. Eam tum adesse, cum dolor omnis absit;
Duarum enim vitarum nobis erunt instituta capienda. Qui autem de summo bono dissentit de tota philosophiae ratione dissentit. Et quod est munus, quod opus sapientiae? Esse enim quam vellet iniquus iustus poterat inpune. Bork Virtutis, magnitudinis animi, patientiae, fortitudinis fomentis dolor mitigari solet. Polemoni et iam ante Aristoteli ea prima visa sunt, quae paulo ante dixi. Similiter sensus, cum accessit ad naturam, tuetur illam quidem, sed etiam se tuetur; Quam si explicavisset, non tam haesitaret.
Eodem modo is enim tibi nemo dabit, quod, expetendum sit, id esse laudabile. Nulla profecto est, quin suam vim retineat a primo ad extremum. Verum hoc idem saepe faciamus. Honesta oratio, Socratica, Platonis etiam.
- View everything as organised energy, that is decaying and dispersing.
Viewing ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quo modo autem optimum, si bonum praeterea nullum est? Multa sunt dicta ab antiquis de contemnendis ac despiciendis rebus humanis; Illo enim addito iuste fit recte factum, per se autem hoc ipsum reddere in officio ponitur. Qua tu etiam inprudens utebare non numquam. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quid, cum volumus nomina eorum, qui quid gesserint, nota nobis esse, parentes, patriam, multa praeterea minime necessaria?
Quid ei reliquisti, nisi te, quoquo modo loqueretur, intellegere, quid diceret? Nullus est igitur cuiusquam dies natalis. Eaedem res maneant alio modo. Commoda autem et incommoda in eo genere sunt, quae praeposita et reiecta diximus; Quae cum dixisset paulumque institisset, Quid est? Quare obscurentur etiam haec, quae secundum naturam esse dicimus, in vita beata; Terram, mihi crede, ea lanx et maria deprimet. Quia nec honesto quic quam honestius nec turpi turpius.
Roges enim Aristonem, bonane ei videantur haec: vacuitas doloris, divitiae, valitudo; Quod maxime efficit Theophrasti de beata vita liber, in quo multum admodum fortunae datur. Ab hoc autem quaedam non melius quam veteres, quaedam omnino relicta. Hoc Hieronymus summum bonum esse dixit. At quicum ioca seria, ut dicitur, quicum arcana, quicum occulta omnia? Haec quo modo conveniant, non sane intellego.
From a scientific point of view, there are some supposed challenges to The Second Law from quantum physics — but to be honest, we still don’t understand those challenges and the associated ongoing debate, which you can explore more in this 2017 Scientific American article.
In truth, we find a more interesting exploration of limitations via how you might use these models as a guide in your broader work and life. From that perspective, you might consider how the application of this model assumes that things decay, rather than change. That is, when applied to businesses, products, or relationships, rather than assuming decay, it might be more useful to assume change — that those elements will continue to evolve and shift which might or might not result in greater disorder. Though the pull towards disorder is still a compelling explanation for countless situations.
The steam engine.
It’s no coincidence that The Laws of Thermodynamics arose during the Industrial Revolution and the birth of the steam engine. The steam engine, at a basic level, has three components — a hot energy source (steam); a device that converts that heat energy into movement (pistons); and a vent that extracts energy that hasn’t been used as heat (a cold sink).
The need for the cold sink demonstrated that when heat was converted to movement, some of the heat was transferred into the system’s surroundings. This was an indicator that for energy to move from a high-temperature body to a low body one that work, or additional energy, was required.
The ice swan.
Imagine an ice sculpture of a swan sitting in an ocean. The sculpture might have incredible detail and artistry, meanwhile, the water around it has undefinable depths. Which do you think has more Entropy?
If you answered with the ocean, you’d be right. The ice sculpture is an ordered and defined object in comparison to the dispersed, random, and dare we say ‘disordered’ state of the water molecules in the ocean. The Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that, without intervention, there is a greater probability that water molecules will organise themselves in the form of an ocean than that of an ice sculpted swan as a result.
Your bedroom.
A common analogy to explain Entropy is that of your messy bedroom. There are more ways your bedroom can be messy, than ways it could be clean and ordered. In that sense, your messy bedroom has high Entropy, and the Second Law would imply that it will tend towards that state if left unchecked.
,
As described in the In Practice section, the field of Thermodynamics was born from the Industrial Revolution and the invention of the steam engine. As with all such ideas, there were many contributors to the field, but French physicist Sadi Carnot was certainly seen as one of the leading thinkers in the space. His discussion of ‘thermodynamic efficiency’ was far ahead of its time.
Rudolf Clausius, working independently in the early 1850s, posited similar ideas after examining how heat from a heated body would flow to one of a lower temperature. He laid the groundwork for the Second Law by explaining: “heat does not pass from a body at low temperature to one at high temperature without an accompanying change elsewhere.”
The origins of these models are generally attributed to Clausius, though it could be rightly argued that Carnot had just as much, if not more, right to claim the mantle.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.