So you suck at delayed gratification? Can’t consistently invest your savings for the big pay off for when you retire? Or perhaps you’re ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quid, quod homines infima fortuna, nulla spe rerum gerendarum, opifices denique delectantur historia? Quasi ego id curem, quid ille aiat aut neget. Quid ait Aristoteles reliquique Platonis alumni? His singulis copiose responderi solet, sed quae perspicua sunt longa esse non debent. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Bork Quis negat? Quis suae urbis conservatorem Codrum, quis Erechthei filias non maxime laudat? Atqui, inquam, Cato, si istud optinueris, traducas me ad te totum licebit. Huic ego, si negaret quicquam interesse ad beate vivendum quali uteretur victu, concederem, laudarem etiam;
Honesta oratio, Socratica, Platonis etiam. Heri, inquam, ludis commissis ex urbe profectus veni ad vesperum. Nec vero alia sunt quaerenda contra Carneadeam illam sententiam. Cupit enim dícere nihil posse ad beatam vitam deesse sapienti.
Neque enim disputari sine reprehensione nec cum iracundia aut pertinacia recte disputari potest. Moriatur, inquit. Suo genere perveniant ad extremum; Prodest, inquit, mihi eo esse animo. At miser, si in flagitiosa et vitiosa vita afflueret voluptatibus. Nunc vides, quid faciat.
- For decisions, use slow thinking to interrupt your bias.
Organise processes or teams to interrupt ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mihi quidem Antiochum, quem audis, satis belle videris attendere. Quae quo sunt excelsiores, eo dant clariora indicia naturae. Hoc dictum in una re latissime patet, ut in omnibus factis re, non teste moveamur. Praeteritis, inquit, gaudeo. An eum locum libenter invisit, ubi Demosthenes et Aeschines inter se decertare soliti sunt? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Nos commodius agimus. Nunc ita separantur, ut disiuncta sint, quo nihil potest esse perversius.
Tu quidem reddes; Sin kakan malitiam dixisses, ad aliud nos unum certum vitium consuetudo Latina traduceret. Nemo nostrum istius generis asotos iucunde putat vivere. His singulis copiose responderi solet, sed quae perspicua sunt longa esse non debent. Piso igitur hoc modo, vir optimus tuique, ut scis, amantissimus. In qua quid est boni praeter summam voluptatem, et eam sempiternam? Habent enim et bene longam et satis litigiosam disputationem. Bork Quis enim est, qui non videat haec esse in natura rerum tria? Inscite autem medicinae et gubernationis ultimum cum ultimo sapientiae comparatur.
Nec lapathi suavitatem acupenseri Galloni Laelius anteponebat, sed suavitatem ipsam neglegebat; Hic Speusippus, hic Xenocrates, hic eius auditor Polemo, cuius illa ipsa sessio fuit, quam videmus. Satisne vobis videor pro meo iure in vestris auribus commentatus? Num quid tale Democritus? Cave putes quicquam esse verius. A quibus propter discendi cupiditatem videmus ultimas terras esse peragratas.
Some criticise the evidence behind Hyperbolic Discounting as, similar to so many behavioural science research, largely relying on university students as they are a cheap and available group of test subjects. Such critics argue that more experienced and older people consider longer views and criteria for their decision making, though this has not been proven through research yet.
Other criticisms do not undermine the observed behaviour behind Hyperbolic Discounting — of people choosing instant gratification — rather the reasoning behind it. So, for example, some point to the role of cravings, arousal and emotions in people seeking immediate rewards — though again, in my view this is relatively academic as the end result remains the same.
$100 versus $120.
Hyperbolic discounting is perhaps best known for the $100 versus $120 experiment. Participants in this experiment were offered a choice between receiving $100 today versus $120 in a week. Most people would choose the $100 immediately. Then they were offered the choice between $100 in a year versus $120 in a year and a week. From a rational perspective, these questions are identical — yet when adding the ‘year’, most people chose to take the $120 option.
Climate change.
This one’s a bit opinionated perhaps, but is it really? It is now pretty clear that climate change is a massive threat to humanity — there, I said it. Yet humans are reticent to act. Compare that to how most governments invested in dealing with the threat of covid when it was having clear immediate impacts. The immediate threat gets the attention, the distant one can be all too easily ignored.
Hyperbolic discounting is a core model in behavioural economics and has countless implications.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave hyperbolic discounting into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Fast and slow thinking: the model that explains the broader backdrop of heuristics and behavioural economics.
- Loss aversion: another fundamental and intrinsically linked model
Complementary models:
- Habit loop: particularly B.J. Foggs idea of ‘tiny habits’ or immediate rewards.
- Systems versus goals: in establishing the routine over relying on a distant goal.
- Divide and conquer: in respect to breaking down large projects.
- Cialdini’s six principles of persuasion: particularly in terms of freemium and quick value in relation to reciprocity.
Hyperbolic discounting was built on the work of Richard Hernstein who developed a ‘matching law’ before coining the term ‘hyperbolic discounting’ in a 1961 paper.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”