Let's say I told you that joining ModelThinkers costs US$200. It doesn't — it actually costs US$60.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quid censes in Latino fore? Mihi enim erit isdem istis fortasse iam utendum. Tu enim ista lenius, hic Stoicorum more nos vexat. Commoda autem et incommoda in eo genere sunt, quae praeposita et reiecta diximus; Sin dicit obscurari quaedam nec apparere, quia valde parva sint, nos quoque concedimus;
Aliter homines, aliter philosophos loqui putas oportere? Beatus autem esse in maximarum rerum timore nemo potest. Virtutis, magnitudinis animi, patientiae, fortitudinis fomentis dolor mitigari solet. Duarum enim vitarum nobis erunt instituta capienda. In eo enim positum est id, quod dicimus esse expetendum. Quid ergo attinet gloriose loqui, nisi constanter loquare? Hos contra singulos dici est melius. Septem autem illi non suo, sed populorum suffragio omnium nominati sunt.
Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Et si turpitudinem fugimus in statu et motu corporis, quid est cur pulchritudinem non sequamur? Restincta enim sitis stabilitatem voluptatis habet, inquit, illa autem voluptas ipsius restinctionis in motu est. Non igitur potestis voluptate omnia dirigentes aut tueri aut retinere virtutem. Omnis enim est natura diligens sui. Plane idem, inquit, et maxima quidem, qua fieri nulla maior potest. De quibus cupio scire quid sentias. Mihi quidem Antiochum, quem audis, satis belle videris attendere. Nos paucis ad haec additis finem faciamus aliquando; Sit, inquam, tam facilis, quam vultis, comparatio voluptatis, quid de dolore dicemus? Est autem etiam actio quaedam corporis, quae motus et status naturae congruentis tenet; Istam voluptatem perpetuam quis potest praestare sapienti?
- Delay and set your own anchor to interrupt anchoring bias.
Anchoring can function as a cognitive b ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Indicant pueri, in quibus ut in speculis natura cernitur. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quod idem cum vestri faciant, non satis magnam tribuunt inventoribus gratiam. Non quaero, quid dicat, sed quid convenienter possit rationi et sententiae suae dicere. Nec vero intermittunt aut admirationem earum rerum, quae sunt ab antiquis repertae, aut investigationem novarum. Nihil opus est exemplis hoc facere longius. Homines optimi non intellegunt totam rationem everti, si ita res se habeat. Audio equidem philosophi vocem, Epicure, sed quid tibi dicendum sit oblitus es.
Bork An eiusdem modi? Quid, quod res alia tota est?
Quo modo autem optimum, si bonum praeterea nullum est? Eademne, quae restincta siti? Bork Idemne potest esse dies saepius, qui semel fuit? Teneo, inquit, finem illi videri nihil dolere. Dic in quovis conventu te omnia facere, ne doleas. Eadem nunc mea adversum te oratio est. An hoc usque quaque, aliter in vita? At iste non dolendi status non vocatur voluptas. An vero displicuit ea, quae tributa est animi virtutibus tanta praestantia?
The Anchoring Effect has been consistently replicated in a number of experiments and studies, with some variations. For example, there remains debate on the impacts of experience in a domain, and in the cognitive ability of participants — with studies in these areas returning mixed results.
That said, it is a largely accepted phenomenon.
Guess Gandhi's age.
In a 1997 experiment by Strack and Mussweiler, the two groups of participants to guess the age of Mahatma Gandhi when he died. Before the groups answered, they were anchored by preceding questions. The questions and results were as follows:
- Did Mahatma Gandhi die before or after the age of 9 years old? How old was he when he died? Average answer = 50 years.
- Did Mahatma Gandhi die before or after the age of 140 years old? How old was he when he died? Average answer = 67 years.
Anchoring in negotiations.
This excellent description by Harvard Law Professor Guhan Subramanian outlines his recommendations and experience in using and countering anchoring in negotiations. From defusing anchoring to justifying an offer that you want to become an anchor.
Anchoring and the law.
In one study, a prosecutor's extreme sentencing demand resulted in 27 to 60% longer prison sentences. Similarly, a journalist's question about sentencing resulted in 32% longer prison sentence. See this article for more examples in the legal context.
Anchoring and the breadmaker.
A company called Williams-Sonoma famously was struggling to sell there new bread maker which was priced at $279. Rather than change the product, or even lower the price, they did something surprising. They started selling a second breadmaker for $429. The result? Few people bought the expensive bread maker but the sales of the (now) cheaper one doubled. While it's hard to know the exact motivation here, it isn't a stretch to posit that the anchoring heuristic was at play — and the 'cheaper' bread maker suddenly seemed like a bargain.
The anchoring heuristic is a cognitive bias that has a range of implications.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the anchoring heuristic into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Fast and slow thinking: to understand broader cognitive biases.
- Availability heuristic: initial information tends to be part of the ‘most available’ information, though availability is broader.
Complementary models:
- EAST framework: incorporate anchoring in nudging strategies.
- BATNA & ZOPA: incorporating anchoring into negotiations.
- RICE score: consider the impact of anchoring in estimates.
- 4Ps of marketing: using anchoring in pricing strategy.
The anchoring heuristic is also known as anchoring bias, the anchoring effect and the anchoring and adjustment heuristic.
The anchoring and adjustment heuristic was first identified by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in 1974. The ‘adjustment’ refers to the tendency for subsequent judgements to change based on the initial anchor. We have shortened this heuristics name to the more familiar ‘anchoring heuristic’. See their book Thinking, Fast and Slow for more.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”