Track the reasons behind challenges and problems in any domain using this hierarchy based tool — bonus, it looks like a fish, what’s no ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ne amores quidem sanctos a sapiente alienos esse arbitrantur. Tu autem negas fortem esse quemquam posse, qui dolorem malum putet. An dolor longissimus quisque miserrimus, voluptatem non optabiliorem diuturnitas facit? Nam aliquando posse recte fieri dicunt nulla expectata nec quaesita voluptate. At ille pellit, qui permulcet sensum voluptate. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Magno hic ingenio, sed res se tamen sic habet, ut nimis imperiosi philosophi sit vetare meminisse.
Tum Torquatus: Prorsus, inquit, assentior; Magni enim aestimabat pecuniam non modo non contra leges, sed etiam legibus partam. Gracchum patrem non beatiorem fuisse quam fillum, cum alter stabilire rem publicam studuerit, alter evertere. Omnia contraria, quos etiam insanos esse vultis. Potius inflammat, ut coercendi magis quam dedocendi esse videantur. Nam bonum ex quo appellatum sit, nescio, praepositum ex eo credo, quod praeponatur aliis.
Zenonis est, inquam, hoc Stoici. Quis suae urbis conservatorem Codrum, quis Erechthei filias non maxime laudat? Quae cum magnifice primo dici viderentur, considerata minus probabantur. Omnes enim iucundum motum, quo sensus hilaretur. Quis enim redargueret? Quod eo liquidius faciet, si perspexerit rerum inter eas verborumne sit controversia. Ut scias me intellegere, primum idem esse dico voluptatem, quod ille don. Restinguet citius, si ardentem acceperit. Quid est, quod ab ea absolvi et perfici debeat? Quid turpius quam sapientis vitam ex insipientium sermone pendere?
- Identify the problem, or effect.
Define the problem or end effect that is being investigated and w ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Beatus autem esse in maximarum rerum timore nemo potest. Expressa vero in iis aetatibus, quae iam confirmatae sunt. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quae sunt igitur communia vobis cum antiquis, iis sic utamur quasi concessis; Hunc vos beatum; Indicant pueri, in quibus ut in speculis natura cernitur. Non enim, si omnia non sequebatur, idcirco non erat ortus illinc. Ut id aliis narrare gestiant? Sine ea igitur iucunde negat posse se vivere?
Ab his oratores, ab his imperatores ac rerum publicarum principes extiterunt. Semper enim ex eo, quod maximas partes continet latissimeque funditur, tota res appellatur. Quae cum praeponunt, ut sit aliqua rerum selectio, naturam videntur sequi; Addidisti ad extremum etiam indoctum fuisse. Itaque sensibus rationem adiunxit et ratione effecta sensus non reliquit. Quid enim? Atqui, inquit, si Stoicis concedis ut virtus sola, si adsit vitam efficiat beatam, concedis etiam Peripateticis. Sed quoniam et advesperascit et mihi ad villam revertendum est, nunc quidem hactenus; Expectoque quid ad id, quod quaerebam, respondeas. Quo plebiscito decreta a senatu est consuli quaestio Cn.
Minime vero istorum quidem, inquit. Non quam nostram quidem, inquit Pomponius iocans; At ille non pertimuit saneque fidenter: Istis quidem ipsis verbis, inquit; Luxuriam non reprehendit, modo sit vacua infinita cupiditate et timore. Si de re disceptari oportet, nulla mihi tecum, Cato, potest esse dissensio.
The main issues with the diagram are the differentiation between causes and sub causes. For example, some causes might be complex, with many elements below them, becoming impractical to capture in the diagram. By breaking it up into separate categories, the diagram also does not lend itself to a more connected view of challenges.
Finally, there is no clear prioritisation within the diagram — all causes seem equal, when in reality a sub cause, which is visually small, might be the key issue. Other causes and sub causes therefore might become a distraction.
Internal damages at IKEA.
This paper from Ikea in Portugal describes a process improvement process to address the level of internal damages in Ikea stores. The diagram below was part of a broader analysis process.
The fishbone or Ishikawa diagram, also known as the cause-and-effect diagram, is a core tool within quality management and is commonly used for improvements in products, manufacturing and other fields.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the fishbone diagram into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- 5 Whys: in digging to root cause, use this as part of the fishbone process.
- Second order thinking: to go beyond the initial cause to sub causes.
- 4Ps of marketing: as possible categories.
Complementary models:
- Risk matrix: to consider potential issues with consequences versus likelihood.
- Chain reaction/ domino effect: to consider the flow on effects of potential issues.
- First principle thinking: to identify and go below assumptions.
- Occam’s razor: to cut to the core of the issue.
- Divide and conquer: separating out and addressing potential causes.
The Fishbone Diagram was created by quality management pioneer Professor Kaoru Ishikawa in 1968. Ishikawa, an engineer, was a leader of quality management at Kawasaki at the time. In his 1986 book, Guide to Quality Control, Ishikawa argued that there were six other key quality tools in addition to what he called the ‘cause-and-effect diagram’, which were: control chart, histogram, flow chart, run chart, scatter diagram and Pareto chart.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”