Save to My Latticework unsave

Aristotle's Rhetoric
Aristotle's Rhetoric
Aristotle's Rhetoric
save0 saved view14.5K views
Share this with your network
Share this with your network
Overview

This model from Ancient Greece has helped define the art of persuasion for over 2,000 years and continues to serve as a guide for impactf ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Respondent extrema primis, media utrisque, omnia omnibus. Non enim solum Torquatus dixit quid sentiret, sed etiam cur. Paulum, cum regem Persem captum adduceret, eodem flumine invectio? Quoniam, si dis placet, ab Epicuro loqui discimus. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quod si ita se habeat, non possit beatam praestare vitam sapientia. Nonne videmus quanta perturbatio rerum omnium consequatur, quanta confusio?

Quae diligentissime contra Aristonem dicuntur a Chryippo. Sed finge non solum callidum eum, qui aliquid improbe faciat, verum etiam praepotentem, ut M. Quid, si etiam iucunda memoria est praeteritorum malorum? Quid iudicant sensus? Theophrastus mediocriterne delectat, cum tractat locos ab Aristotele ante tractatos? Tu quidem reddes;

Quae cum dixisset, finem ille. Quid, cum fictas fabulas, e quibus utilitas nulla elici potest, cum voluptate legimus? Id est enim, de quo quaerimus. Graecis hoc modicum est: Leonidas, Epaminondas, tres aliqui aut quattuor; Quam ob rem tandem, inquit, non satisfacit? Sin dicit obscurari quaedam nec apparere, quia valde parva sint, nos quoque concedimus; Claudii libidini, qui tum erat summo ne imperio, dederetur.

Share this model with your network to be smarter, faster, together!
Actionable Takeaways
  • Deeply understand your audience. 

What are their current ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Non est ista, inquam, Piso, magna dissensio. Ita graviter et severe voluptatem secrevit a bono. Tanta vis admonitionis inest in locis; Sed in rebus apertissimis nimium longi sumus. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Neque enim civitas in seditione beata esse potest nec in discordia dominorum domus; Quid enim mihi potest esse optatius quam cum Catone, omnium virtutum auctore, de virtutibus disputare? Sed tamen enitar et, si minus multa mihi occurrent, non fugiam ista popularia. Quod non faceret, si in voluptate summum bonum poneret. Qui ita affectus, beatum esse numquam probabis;

Hos contra singulos dici est melius. Dici enim nihil potest verius. Etenim semper illud extra est, quod arte comprehenditur. Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus? Ac ne plura complectar-sunt enim innumerabilia-, bene laudata virtus voluptatis aditus intercludat necesse est. Quasi vero, inquit, perpetua oratio rhetorum solum, non etiam philosophorum sit. Negare non possum. Quod eo liquidius faciet, si perspexerit rerum inter eas verborumne sit controversia.

Incommoda autem et commoda-ita enim estmata et dustmata appello-communia esse voluerunt, paria noluerunt. Causa autem fuit huc veniendi ut quosdam hinc libros promerem. Pauca mutat vel plura sane; Si longus, levis. Igitur ne dolorem quidem. Facillimum id quidem est, inquam. Illa sunt similia: hebes acies est cuipiam oculorum, corpore alius senescit;

Limitations

Plato, Aristotle’s teacher, was critical of persuasion techniques, seemingly to rally against the form and emotional element winning arguments over a logical case as an example of manipulation. Aristotle did counter this, suggesting that the art of persuasion was a necessary but neutral tool and that it should be used ethically. 

Other criticism of the model tends to be in its application, as it sets a broad framework but potentially lacks more practical application. In other words, while a useful guide, the model still takes considerable skill to apply effectively and consistently. 

In Practice

Legal application. 

This 2014 research paper describes how Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle is a crucial tool in the courtroom. The author explains: 

“Logos, ethos, and pathos, a persuader’s logical, credibility-related, and emotional appeals, when used in concert, create a whole argument. This argument is one which takes into account the human element as well as the rational and logical needs of the law in its pursuit of justice. Classical Aristotelian rhetoric, thus, must not be dismissed by the advocate hoping to most effectively represent his client. Nor should it be dismissed by the legal community as form over substance.As I have demonstrated, the end result of an attorney utilizing Aristotle’s three modes together is the fairest result possible in a given situation, so substance is not sacrificed, and effective form is still maintained.”

“I have a dream.” 

I could have chosen an analysis of any modern speech based on Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle, I went with Martin Luthor King’s classic. 

This article breaks it down, including noting the following: 

Ethos

  • By way of establishing his intentions, “In his speech, King frequently looks back at moments in American history and refers to the leaders who laid the foundation of free America.” 

Pathos

  • Given the moment of anger and frustration he was speaking in, there’s no wonder that Pathos was a main ingredient. “His speech keeps growing more dramatic and engaging. King tries to make the frustration visible that years of neglect have caused.” 

Logos

  • King paints the future state, the ‘dream’, and lays out a path to achieve it, heavily referencing American history. 

Build your latticework
This model will help you to:

m

Origins & Resources

Aristotle’s Rhetoric was set out in his book On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civil Discourse. I say 'book' because it has been published as such but, like his other works, seems to have been a collection of his student’s notes in response to his lectures. His body of work on persuasion did progress and shift over his life, though these three appeals remained consistent. 

Other modern sources to dive into this model include the work of Carmine Gallo, see his HBR article on the topic; and Sam Leith’s Words Like Loaded Pistols. For a more in-depth albeit slightly academic view of this model, you can also visit the entry in Stanford’s Encyclopedia of Philosophy.    

My Notes

    Nothing here yet. Join ModelThinkers and login to be the first to comment.
Already a ModelThinkers member? Please log in here.

Oops, That’s Members’ Only!

Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.

ModelThinkers membership at a glance:

Small mark
UNLOCK EVERYTHING
Access all mental models and premium content.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR LATTICEWORK
Save models to your personal list.
Small mark
QUICKLY MEMORISE MODELS
Use our Learn function to embed models to memory
Small mark
PERSONALISE MODELS
Add your own notes and reminders.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR ‘EXTERNAL BRAIN’
Discover a new idea? Capture it by adding a new model.
Small mark
JOIN THE MT COMMUNITY
Rate models, comment and access exclusive events.

“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”

Arun Pradhan & Shai Desai
CoFounders, ModelThinkers.

You Might Also Like:

- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.