Save to My Latticework unsave

Directly Responsible Individual
Directly Responsible Individual
Directly Responsible Individual
save0 saved view8.1K views
Share this with your network
Share this with your network
Overview

There’s no denying the central role of collaboration in our connected world. But there’s also no denying that you’ve li ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam quibus rebus efficiuntur voluptates, eae non sunt in potestate sapientis. Graece donan, Latine voluptatem vocant. Si enim, ut mihi quidem videtur, non explet bona naturae voluptas, iure praetermissa est; Ita fit cum gravior, tum etiam splendidior oratio. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quae cum dixisset paulumque institisset, Quid est? Audeo dicere, inquit. Summum a vobis bonum voluptas dicitur. Bonum liberi: misera orbitas.

In eo autem voluptas omnium Latine loquentium more ponitur, cum percipitur ea, quae sensum aliquem moveat, iucunditas. Nobis aliter videtur, recte secusne, postea; Sed ego in hoc resisto; Quis non odit sordidos, vanos, leves, futtiles? Summum a vobis bonum voluptas dicitur. Quae animi affectio suum cuique tribuens atque hanc, quam dico. Illa argumenta propria videamus, cur omnia sint paria peccata. Longum est enim ad omnia respondere, quae a te dicta sunt. Nihil acciderat ei, quod nollet, nisi quod anulum, quo delectabatur, in mari abiecerat.

Scio enim esse quosdam, qui quavis lingua philosophari possint; Et certamen honestum et disputatio splendida! omnis est enim de virtutis dignitate contentio. Multoque hoc melius nos veriusque quam Stoici. Sit enim idem caecus, debilis. Itaque primos congressus copulationesque et consuetudinum instituendarum voluntates fieri propter voluptatem; Nam et complectitur verbis, quod vult, et dicit plane, quod intellegam; Sint modo partes vitae beatae.

Share this model with your network to be smarter, faster, together!
Actionable Takeaways
  • Assign DRIs to projects and parts of projects. 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quid in isto egregio tuo officio et tanta fide-sic enim existimo-ad corpus refers? Plane idem, inquit, et maxima quidem, qua fieri nulla maior potest. Tum Triarius: Posthac quidem, inquit, audacius. Aliter homines, aliter philosophos loqui putas oportere? Hanc quoque iucunditatem, si vis, transfer in animum;

Nec lapathi suavitatem acupenseri Galloni Laelius anteponebat, sed suavitatem ipsam neglegebat; Aut, Pylades cum sis, dices te esse Orestem, ut moriare pro amico? Quia nec honesto quic quam honestius nec turpi turpius. His similes sunt omnes, qui virtuti student levantur vitiis, levantur erroribus, nisi forte censes Ti. Quod quidem nobis non saepe contingit. Cur igitur, inquam, res tam dissimiles eodem nomine appellas? Eiuro, inquit adridens, iniquum, hac quidem de re; Sed tamen enitar et, si minus multa mihi occurrent, non fugiam ista popularia. Qua tu etiam inprudens utebare non numquam. Quis est enim, in quo sit cupiditas, quin recte cupidus dici possit? Quorum altera prosunt, nocent altera. Quamquam haec quidem praeposita recte et reiecta dicere licebit. Nam illud vehementer repugnat, eundem beatum esse et multis malis oppressum.

Nunc ita separantur, ut disiuncta sint, quo nihil potest esse perversius. Aut haec tibi, Torquate, sunt vituperanda aut patrocinium voluptatis repudiandum. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Illud dico, ea, quae dicat, praeclare inter se cohaerere.

Limitations

DRIs mean a single point of responsibility, but not necessarily a single point of thought or work. The risk with this model is that if someone is not the DRI for a task or project, they might not contribute as much, and instead focus on their own DRIs. In that sense, the risk here is inadvertently creating greater silos under the pretense of individuals taking responsibility.

In Practice

Cross-functional practice. 

Gloria Lin, a previous employee at Apple, advocated DRIs and implemented them at Flipboard. In a response originally posted on Quora, she explained the value to cross-functional teams: 

You want a DRI who is responsible for driving the team's sleuthing until the issue is solved. Often this is an engineering lead or an engineering program manager. Say it's mostly a mechanical engineering issue with a little bit of HW involved. Then usually a PD (product design) engineer will be the DRI, and they will work with the HW engineers to resolve the problem. If something keeps failing on the prototype testing lines, then you could have a TPM (test program manager) as DRI, working in conjunction with the Apple engineering teams, testing equipment vendor, and contract manufacturer teams.”

MobileMe and accountability.

In 2008, Apple launched MobileMe, an email system aimed to provide a seamless experience and knock BlackBerry from its business user lead. What’s that? You haven’t heard of MobileMe? That’s because it was a complete failure. 

The story goes that Steve Jobs promptly gathered the MobileMe team to a Town Hall where the relevant DRI was fired and replaced. It should be noted that advocates of DRI point out that firing those responsible is not the main purpose, practice or pay off for using it.  

Build your latticework
This model will help you to:

d

Origins & Resources

When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, one of the major changes he made was to get rid of traditional business divisions, with their separate Profit and Loss (P&L) responsibilities. Jobs fired the general managers of these abolished business units and instead moved to a functional organisation approach under a single business-wide P&L, and this structure remains today. 

This runs against standard business wisdom that tells us that large corporations must be organised through multiple divisions, essentially run as independent business units, to promote accountability. Instead, Apple has focused on functional expertise and greater cross-functional teaming — which some argue is a key contributor to their culture of innovation. 

It might be argued that DRI grew in Apple because of the gap in accountability that grew from the lack of divisional responsibility. Either way, it’s an approach that can be adopted in any organisational size and structure. 

My Notes

    Nothing here yet. Join ModelThinkers and login to be the first to comment.
Already a ModelThinkers member? Please log in here.

Oops, That’s Members’ Only!

Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.

ModelThinkers membership at a glance:

Small mark
UNLOCK EVERYTHING
Access all mental models and premium content.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR LATTICEWORK
Save models to your personal list.
Small mark
QUICKLY MEMORISE MODELS
Use our Learn function to embed models to memory
Small mark
PERSONALISE MODELS
Add your own notes and reminders.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR ‘EXTERNAL BRAIN’
Discover a new idea? Capture it by adding a new model.
Small mark
JOIN THE MT COMMUNITY
Rate models, comment and access exclusive events.

“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”

Arun Pradhan & Shai Desai
CoFounders, ModelThinkers.

You Might Also Like:

- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.