Whether applied to economies, ideas, systems, or politics — this model describes how something new and transformative can both be born from, ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Isto modo ne improbos quidem, si essent boni viri. Istam voluptatem perpetuam quis potest praestare sapienti? Qua tu etiam inprudens utebare non numquam. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Re mihi non aeque satisfacit, et quidem locis pluribus. An ea, quae per vinitorem antea consequebatur, per se ipsa curabit? Qua igitur re ab deo vincitur, si aeternitate non vincitur? Si autem id non concedatur, non continuo vita beata tollitur.
Urgent tamen et nihil remittunt. Qui-vere falsone, quaerere mittimus-dicitur oculis se privasse; Quicquid porro animo cernimus, id omne oritur a sensibus; Cuius quidem, quoniam Stoicus fuit, sententia condemnata mihi videtur esse inanitas ista verborum.
Illud quaero, quid ei, qui in voluptate summum bonum ponat, consentaneum sit dicere. Isto modo, ne si avia quidem eius nata non esset. At eum nihili facit; Ego vero isti, inquam, permitto. Ex ea difficultate illae fallaciloquae, ut ait Accius, malitiae natae sunt. In eo enim positum est id, quod dicimus esse expetendum. Tantum dico, magis fuisse vestrum agere Epicuri diem natalem, quam illius testamento cavere ut ageretur. Certe, nisi voluptatem tanti aestimaretis. An hoc usque quaque, aliter in vita? De vacuitate doloris eadem sententia erit.
- Work with the impact of digital disruption accelerating creative destruction.
The accelerated rate of cr ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Atqui haec patefactio quasi rerum opertarum, cum quid quidque sit aperitur, definitio est. Similiter sensus, cum accessit ad naturam, tuetur illam quidem, sed etiam se tuetur; Quid dubitas igitur mutare principia naturae? Nulla profecto est, quin suam vim retineat a primo ad extremum. Falli igitur possumus. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quem si tenueris, non modo meum Ciceronem, sed etiam me ipsum abducas licebit. Illa tamen simplicia, vestra versuta. Habent enim et bene longam et satis litigiosam disputationem.
Cetera illa adhibebat, quibus demptis negat se Epicurus intellegere quid sit bonum. Dolere malum est: in crucem qui agitur, beatus esse non potest. Mihi vero, inquit, placet agi subtilius et, ut ipse dixisti, pressius. Sed quid ages tandem, si utilitas ab amicitia, ut fit saepe, defecerit? Sed ad haec, nisi molestum est, habeo quae velim. Videmus igitur ut conquiescere ne infantes quidem possint. An eum discere ea mavis, quae cum plane perdidiceriti nihil sciat? Quae diligentissime contra Aristonem dicuntur a Chryippo. Negat esse eam, inquit, propter se expetendam. Innumerabilia dici possunt in hanc sententiam, sed non necesse est.
Ait enim se, si uratur, Quam hoc suave! dicturum. Haec para/doca illi, nos admirabilia dicamus. Age nunc isti doceant, vel tu potius quis enim ista melius? Quae fere omnia appellantur uno ingenii nomine, easque virtutes qui habent, ingeniosi vocantur. Similiter sensus, cum accessit ad naturam, tuetur illam quidem, sed etiam se tuetur; Utrum igitur tibi litteram videor an totas paginas commovere? In quo etsi est magnus, tamen nova pleraque et perpauca de moribus. Ut non sine causa ex iis memoriae ducta sit disciplina.
Creative Destruction in a free market context assumes that the market drives great practice solutions. Some critics might argue that instead, it drives better sales and profits, which is not always associated with high-quality products and services, or people’s needs being met more effectively.
Another criticism of this model is the contrast with models such as compounding, and the power of marginal gains as opposed to complete destruction and reinvention.
And finally, the model is sometimes used to justify the existence of global tech monopolies. Schumpeter argued that organisations grow to monopolies because they do what they do well - so a true embrace of more purist free-market ideas which I would argue is problematic.
Illinois Railroads.
Joseph Schumpeter, the originator of the term, cited the development of railroads in Illinois as an example of creative destruction. He explained: “The Illinois Central not only meant very good business whilst it was built and whilst new cities were built around it and land was cultivated, but it spelt the death sentence for the [old] agriculture of the West."
The rise of Silicon Valley
This New York Times article notes the popularity of this model to explain current economic trends impacted by digital disruption: “Schumpeter's theory and phraseology have become mainstream today for describing the current era, in which new-economy companies are being created at an astounding rate. No less an establishment figure as Alan Greenspan, chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board and a Harvard-trained economist, has been using Schumpeterian economics to explain the remarkable noninflationary expansion in the United States over the past eight years.”
Greenspan went on to outline the impact of key innovations, from the microprocessor, lasers, fibre optics and particularly the role of information technology.
The creative destruction mental model is similar to the concept of disruptive innovation, in the way new approaches can replace and make previous ones obsolete.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave creative destruction into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Red queen effect: in understanding the perpetual drive to be smart and disrupt.
- Disruptive innovation: in changing the game.
Complementary models:
- Compounding: contrasting, in many ways opposite mental models, that benefit from being contrasted with one another.
- Design thinking and agile methodology: methods to seek out those new disruptive ideas.
- Scientific method: as a methodology to strive towards a greater understanding of the truth, relying on creative destruction of theories in some instances.
- Munger’s latticework: when applied to the development and unlearning of mental models.
Creative Disruption was coined by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1942, deriving it from the work of Karl Marx, who pointed to the destructive nature of progressive social systems which he argued would eventually lead to socialism replacing capitalism.
In his 1942 book, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Schumpeter explained: “the process of industrial mutation that continuously revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.”
It is ironic that this term, now associated with pointing to the benefits and resilience of free-market systems, was originally described as an inherent contradiction within capitalism, that would lead to its downfall.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”