They can’t have it all right? So the next time you’re sorting through a long, long list of requirements with a group of stakeholders, c ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut non sine causa ex iis memoriae ducta sit disciplina. Si verbum sequimur, primum longius verbum praepositum quam bonum. Est enim effectrix multarum et magnarum voluptatum. Ergo hoc quidem apparet, nos ad agendum esse natos. Claudii libidini, qui tum erat summo ne imperio, dederetur. Duae sunt enim res quoque, ne tu verba solum putes.
Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Multa sunt dicta ab antiquis de contemnendis ac despiciendis rebus humanis; Terram, mihi crede, ea lanx et maria deprimet. Non dolere, inquam, istud quam vim habeat postea videro; Nec tamen ille erat sapiens quis enim hoc aut quando aut ubi aut unde? Non autem hoc: igitur ne illud quidem. Non pugnem cum homine, cur tantum habeat in natura boni; Habes, inquam, Cato, formam eorum, de quibus loquor, philosophorum.
Sextilio Rufo, cum is rem ad amicos ita deferret, se esse heredem Q. Iam in altera philosophiae parte. Qua tu etiam inprudens utebare non numquam. Quantam rem agas, ut Circeis qui habitet totum hunc mundum suum municipium esse existimet?
- Identify goals and participants.
Understanding the nature of the project, including key purpose, a ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sic enim maiores nostri labores non fugiendos tristissimo tamen verbo aerumnas etiam in deo nominaverunt. Suam denique cuique naturam esse ad vivendum ducem. Quae si potest singula consolando levare, universa quo modo sustinebit? Non igitur de improbo, sed de callido improbo quaerimus, qualis Q. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Restinguet citius, si ardentem acceperit. Nec enim, omnes avaritias si aeque avaritias esse dixerimus, sequetur ut etiam aequas esse dicamus.
In omni enim arte vel studio vel quavis scientia vel in ipsa virtute optimum quidque rarissimum est. Traditur, inquit, ab Epicuro ratio neglegendi doloris. Progredientibus autem aetatibus sensim tardeve potius quasi nosmet ipsos cognoscimus. Sic igitur in homine perfectio ista in eo potissimum, quod est optimum, id est in virtute, laudatur. Si de re disceptari oportet, nulla mihi tecum, Cato, potest esse dissensio. Nam de isto magna dissensio est.
At ille non pertimuit saneque fidenter: Istis quidem ipsis verbis, inquit; Deinde disputat, quod cuiusque generis animantium statui deceat extremum. Sed tempus est, si videtur, et recta quidem ad me. An dubium est, quin virtus ita maximam partem optineat in rebus humanis, ut reliquas obruat? Nunc haec primum fortasse audientis servire debemus. Illud mihi a te nimium festinanter dictum videtur, sapientis omnis esse semper beatos; Tecum optime, deinde etiam cum mediocri amico. Quid, quod homines infima fortuna, nulla spe rerum gerendarum, opifices denique delectantur historia? Quodsi vultum tibi, si incessum fingeres, quo gravior viderere, non esses tui similis; Intrandum est igitur in rerum naturam et penitus quid ea postulet pervidendum;
The MoSCoW Method is highly subjective, not providing clear criteria for the various categories, nor providing distinctions within a category. For example, if ten requirements are identified as ‘must-haves’, there is no further prioritisation of them within the method.
Life sciences platform.
This case study from Browser, a user-centred consulting firm, describes how they helped their client to establish a life science platform using the MoSCoW Method.
The MoSCoW method is a product feature prioritisation technique that takes a slightly different approach to alternative such as RICE scores, impact effort matrix or the kano model.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the MoSCoW method into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- RICE score, impact effort matrix and Kano method: as alternatives ways of prioritising.
- Pareto principle: in establishing how to identify the 20 that delivers the 80.
- Eisenhower matrix: which is a more individually targeted approach based on similar concepts.
Complementary models:
- Agile methodology: an iterative approach that works well with this form of prioritisation.
- Empathy map: to consider the potential impact on a specific audience group.
- Zawinski’s law: a warning to prioritise and avoid product bloat.
- Lean thinking: considering how to deliver real value with fewer resources, and potentially features.
- Minimum viable product: to test core basic ‘must have’ features from a customer perspective.
- Golden circle: to identify the core purpose of your business to guide product feature decisions.
- First principles: understanding the core offer of a product and need of a customer.
The MoSCoW Method was developed by Dai Clegg who, with a rich history of big data and data modelling for a range of large corporates, now works for Evidence for Development — an NGO dedicated to reducing poverty with evidence-based decisions.
Clegg originally developed the method for prioritisation in timeboxed projects during his time with Oracle and it was later donated to the Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM).
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”