0 saved
12.5K views
Whether you’re writing fiction, starting a marketing campaign, crafting a pitch, or trying to ride the ups and downs of an entrepreneurial li ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ergo, si semel tristior effectus est, hilara vita amissa est? Sed eum qui audiebant, quoad poterant, defendebant sententiam suam. Qua tu etiam inprudens utebare non numquam. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Estne, quaeso, inquam, sitienti in bibendo voluptas? Quae quidem vel cum periculo est quaerenda vobis; Non ego tecum iam ita iocabor, ut isdem his de rebus, cum L. Virtutibus igitur rectissime mihi videris et ad consuetudinem nostrae orationis vitia posuisse contraria.
Duae sunt enim res quoque, ne tu verba solum putes. Polycratem Samium felicem appellabant. Facit igitur Lucius noster prudenter, qui audire de summo bono potissimum velit; Inscite autem medicinae et gubernationis ultimum cum ultimo sapientiae comparatur. At ille non pertimuit saneque fidenter: Istis quidem ipsis verbis, inquit; Nam memini etiam quae nolo, oblivisci non possum quae volo. Atqui haec patefactio quasi rerum opertarum, cum quid quidque sit aperitur, definitio est. Nullum inveniri verbum potest quod magis idem declaret Latine, quod Graece, quam declarat voluptas. Hic ambiguo ludimur. Atque ab his initiis profecti omnium virtutum et originem et progressionem persecuti sunt. Restinguet citius, si ardentem acceperit. Si stante, hoc natura videlicet vult, salvam esse se, quod concedimus;
Atque haec coniunctio confusioque virtutum tamen a philosophis ratione quadam distinguitur. Progredientibus autem aetatibus sensim tardeve potius quasi nosmet ipsos cognoscimus. Apparet statim, quae sint officia, quae actiones. An hoc usque quaque, aliter in vita? Respondent extrema primis, media utrisque, omnia omnibus.
- Create narratives with this structure in mind.
Rather than follow the model religiously, use it as ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam quibus rebus efficiuntur voluptates, eae non sunt in potestate sapientis. Quas enim kakaw Graeci appellant, vitia malo quam malitias nominare. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Intellegi quidem, ut propter aliam quampiam rem, verbi gratia propter voluptatem, nos amemus; Hoc mihi cum tuo fratre convenit. Obsecro, inquit, Torquate, haec dicit Epicurus?
Si de re disceptari oportet, nulla mihi tecum, Cato, potest esse dissensio. Non quaero, quid dicat, sed quid convenienter possit rationi et sententiae suae dicere. De ingenio eius in his disputationibus, non de moribus quaeritur. Quae cum essent dicta, finem fecimus et ambulandi et disputandi.
Minime vero istorum quidem, inquit. Non quam nostram quidem, inquit Pomponius iocans; Quae cum praeponunt, ut sit aliqua rerum selectio, naturam videntur sequi; Quae diligentissime contra Aristonem dicuntur a Chryippo. Sed ille, ut dixi, vitiose.
There were many critiques about whether or not Campbell’s original model really applied to folklore, or whether he selectively cited his examples. At the same time, his model which referenced such things as ‘meeting with goddess’ and ‘woman as temptress’ was rightly critiqued from a feminist perspective. I would argue that the updated model from Vogler does address many of these issues, especially when seen as a ‘loose framework’ rather than a tight script.
Another criticism is about its complexity and therefore usefulness to be applied. Vogler obviously reduced and streamlined the stages from 17 to 12 but even so it might be too much for some applications. Indeed, Dan Harmon, who was behind Community and Rick and Morty, simplified it further to the story circle which consists of 8 stages: a character in comfort; they want something; they enter an unfamiliar situation; they adapt; they get what they wanted; they pay a price; they return to their familiar situation; they’ve changed.
Perhaps the biggest criticism in a business context is that the approach is too bloated for a busy, overwhelmed audience. If that’s the case, Minto’s Pyramid or other models might be a better approach.
So many examples.
Many examples have been cited to back up the relevance of the Hero’s Journey in storytelling. I particularly like this wonderful infographic explaining how it applies in popular movies such as Harry Potter, Star Wars, the Matrix, Spiderman, the Lion King and the Lord of the Rings.
The hero’s journey is a fundamental, persistent and broadly used model in storytelling.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the hero’s journey into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Three act model: a three act approach to storytelling.
- Minto's pyramid: it’s different but the simplified business focused narrative structure bares some resemblance.
Complementary models:
- Journey map: use the hero’s journey to provide a structure to a customer journey.
- Design thinking: to empathise with a protagonist or customer as part of telling their story.
- Lean startup: tell your entrepreneurial story with the hero’s journey.
- Non violent communication: another communication model that you might incorporate with the hero's journey to express yourself in a more compelling way.
First described in 1949 by Joseph Campbell in his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces, the hero’s journey, or monomyth, aimed to capture the universal or archetypal story element found everywhere. Campbell originally described 17 stages to the model. Our diagram references the modernised and simplified version presented by Christopher Vogler in his 2007 book, The Writer’s Journey, though we have still cited Campbell as the model’s originator.
For more, watch this animated video about the hero’s journey from TedEd. Or, for my favourite video on the topic, view the Glove and Boots puppet inspired explanation of the character archetypes in the hero’s journey.
The Emma Coates framework mentioned in the summary above came from this Pixar story page by David Price.
My Notes
-
1053 days ago mlrAnother limitation is the gendered nature of Campbell's model - the heroine's journey is different and well documented. The male-gendered (Campbell) hero figure acts alone, sacrifices his connections with family and society, and seeks goals that ultimately exile him from society. In contrast, the female-gendered heroine responds to a loss of power by turning to friends and family for assistance; she enables others to have agency and demonstrate their own talents; and when she regains power, there's usually a compromise solution that is designed to bring benefits to all sides. See Gail Carriger (2020) The Heroine's Journey for a fast, easy-to-read summary of both models, as applied to writing novels and movies. https://gailcarriger.com/books/the-heroines-journey-for-authors-book/
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.