0 saved
8.7K views
So you suck at delayed gratification? Can’t consistently invest your savings for the big pay off for when you retire? Or perhaps you’re ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In his igitur partibus duabus nihil erat, quod Zeno commutare gestiret. Sed emolumenta communia esse dicuntur, recte autem facta et peccata non habentur communia. Cur igitur, inquam, res tam dissimiles eodem nomine appellas? Innumerabilia dici possunt in hanc sententiam, sed non necesse est. Sed ad haec, nisi molestum est, habeo quae velim. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Cum id fugiunt, re eadem defendunt, quae Peripatetici, verba. Nunc haec primum fortasse audientis servire debemus.
Ut non sine causa ex iis memoriae ducta sit disciplina. Minime vero istorum quidem, inquit. Polycratem Samium felicem appellabant. Quid vero? Sed id ne cogitari quidem potest quale sit, ut non repugnet ipsum sibi. Tollitur beneficium, tollitur gratia, quae sunt vincla concordiae. Sapiens autem semper beatus est et est aliquando in dolore;
At tu eadem ista dic in iudicio aut, si coronam times, dic in senatu. Quid affers, cur Thorius, cur Caius Postumius, cur omnium horum magister, Orata, non iucundissime vixerit? Qui enim existimabit posse se miserum esse beatus non erit. Cave putes quicquam esse verius. Itaque primos congressus copulationesque et consuetudinum instituendarum voluntates fieri propter voluptatem;
- For decisions, use slow thinking to interrupt your bias.
Organise processes or teams to interrupt ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Optime, inquam. Ita redarguitur ipse a sese, convincunturque scripta eius probitate ipsius ac moribus. Quid autem habent admirationis, cum prope accesseris? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Sin dicit obscurari quaedam nec apparere, quia valde parva sint, nos quoque concedimus; Tollitur beneficium, tollitur gratia, quae sunt vincla concordiae.
Mihi vero, inquit, placet agi subtilius et, ut ipse dixisti, pressius. Nunc omni virtuti vitium contrario nomine opponitur. At cum de plurimis eadem dicit, tum certe de maximis. Haec para/doca illi, nos admirabilia dicamus. Quae cum essent dicta, finem fecimus et ambulandi et disputandi.
Atqui reperies, inquit, in hoc quidem pertinacem; Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem.
Some criticise the evidence behind Hyperbolic Discounting as, similar to so many behavioural science research, largely relying on university students as they are a cheap and available group of test subjects. Such critics argue that more experienced and older people consider longer views and criteria for their decision making, though this has not been proven through research yet.
Other criticisms do not undermine the observed behaviour behind Hyperbolic Discounting — of people choosing instant gratification — rather the reasoning behind it. So, for example, some point to the role of cravings, arousal and emotions in people seeking immediate rewards — though again, in my view this is relatively academic as the end result remains the same.
$100 versus $120.
Hyperbolic discounting is perhaps best known for the $100 versus $120 experiment. Participants in this experiment were offered a choice between receiving $100 today versus $120 in a week. Most people would choose the $100 immediately. Then they were offered the choice between $100 in a year versus $120 in a year and a week. From a rational perspective, these questions are identical — yet when adding the ‘year’, most people chose to take the $120 option.
Climate change.
This one’s a bit opinionated perhaps, but is it really? It is now pretty clear that climate change is a massive threat to humanity — there, I said it. Yet humans are reticent to act. Compare that to how most governments invested in dealing with the threat of covid when it was having clear immediate impacts. The immediate threat gets the attention, the distant one can be all too easily ignored.
Hyperbolic discounting is a core model in behavioural economics and has countless implications.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave hyperbolic discounting into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Fast and slow thinking: the model that explains the broader backdrop of heuristics and behavioural economics.
- Loss aversion: another fundamental and intrinsically linked model
Complementary models:
- Habit loop: particularly B.J. Foggs idea of ‘tiny habits’ or immediate rewards.
- Systems versus goals: in establishing the routine over relying on a distant goal.
- Divide and conquer: in respect to breaking down large projects.
- Cialdini’s six principles of persuasion: particularly in terms of freemium and quick value in relation to reciprocity.
Hyperbolic discounting was built on the work of Richard Hernstein who developed a ‘matching law’ before coining the term ‘hyperbolic discounting’ in a 1961 paper.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.