Save to My Latticework unsave

BATNA & ZOPA
BATNA & ZOPA
BATNA & ZOPA
save0 saved view11.4K views
Share this with your network
Share this with your network
Overview

Use this model to frame and inform your negotiation strategy. 

Best Alternative to a Negotia ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quaesita enim virtus est, non quae relinqueret naturam, sed quae tueretur. Ratio enim nostra consentit, pugnat oratio. Me igitur ipsum ames oportet, non mea, si veri amici futuri sumus. Nam quibus rebus efficiuntur voluptates, eae non sunt in potestate sapientis.

Nunc ita separantur, ut disiuncta sint, quo nihil potest esse perversius. Quid vero? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Fortitudinis quaedam praecepta sunt ac paene leges, quae effeminari virum vetant in dolore. Quid, de quo nulla dissensio est? At, illa, ut vobis placet, partem quandam tuetur, reliquam deserit. Piso igitur hoc modo, vir optimus tuique, ut scis, amantissimus. Maximus dolor, inquit, brevis est.

Tuo vero id quidem, inquam, arbitratu. Huius, Lyco, oratione locuples, rebus ipsis ielunior. Multa sunt dicta ab antiquis de contemnendis ac despiciendis rebus humanis; Quae in controversiam veniunt, de iis, si placet, disseramus. Satis est tibi in te, satis in legibus, satis in mediocribus amicitiis praesidii. Est autem officium, quod ita factum est, ut eius facti probabilis ratio reddi possit. Ita graviter et severe voluptatem secrevit a bono. Cur iustitia laudatur?

Share this model with your network to be smarter, faster, together!
Actionable Takeaways
  • Know your exact BATNA.

Create a list of actions you can take if no agreement is reached and choose the m ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Certe nihil nisi quod possit ipsum propter se iure laudari. Est enim tanti philosophi tamque nobilis audacter sua decreta defendere. Illa tamen simplicia, vestra versuta. Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem. Sed ad rem redeamus; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quae ista amicitia est? Nam aliquando posse recte fieri dicunt nulla expectata nec quaesita voluptate. Quae quidem vel cum periculo est quaerenda vobis; An est aliquid, quod te sua sponte delectet?

An dolor longissimus quisque miserrimus, voluptatem non optabiliorem diuturnitas facit? Nemo nostrum istius generis asotos iucunde putat vivere. Vitae autem degendae ratio maxime quidem illis placuit quieta. Habes, inquam, Cato, formam eorum, de quibus loquor, philosophorum. Si quicquam extra virtutem habeatur in bonis. Graecum enim hunc versum nostis omnes-: Suavis laborum est praeteritorum memoria. Nemo igitur esse beatus potest.

Sed ut iis bonis erigimur, quae expectamus, sic laetamur iis, quae recordamur. Bork Tenesne igitur, inquam, Hieronymus Rhodius quid dicat esse summum bonum, quo putet omnia referri oportere? Haec et tu ita posuisti, et verba vestra sunt. Quis non odit sordidos, vanos, leves, futtiles? Quamquam haec quidem praeposita recte et reiecta dicere licebit. Qua tu etiam inprudens utebare non numquam. Non potes, nisi retexueris illa. Quo modo autem optimum, si bonum praeterea nullum est? At quanta conantur! Mundum hunc omnem oppidum esse nostrum! Incendi igitur eos, qui audiunt, vides.

Explore More
BATNA & ZOPA is featured in these playbooks:
Limitations

Your BATNA's strength can easily be affected by unexpected changes in conditions. At the same time, determining BATNAs for you and your counterparty is difficult due to subjectivity, as we have a tendency to overestimate the strength of our BATNA and to underestimate the strength of the other side's BATNA. 

Other factors influencing BATNA, like relationship value and the likelihood of the other party maintaining their side of the bargain are also difficult to value and measure in a quantifiable manner.

Finally, using BATNA as a mental model to assist in negotiations should not be counterposed to developing rapport, active listening and other methods to connect and find potential win-win options. 

In Practice

The Brexit BATNA. 

In August 2018 British Prime Minister Theresa May revealed a plan of contingency for exiting the European Union (E.U.) if the so-called Brexit negotiations ended in an impasse, revealing the Government’s BATNA to quell the public’s fears.

Salary negotiation.

In a salary negotiation, the employee might have a basic BATNA of their current salary, assuming that the negotiation will not end with them losing their job. They might increase this by applying for an alternative position with a higher salary, which will become their new BATNA. In such a case, it is not a like for like comparison so the BATNA might become difficult to assess. For the company, they must consider the cost of losing the staff member if they do not meet their expectations. Again this cost is hard to measure.

Build your latticework
This model will help you to:

BATNA is a fundamental mental model in negotiation theory. 

Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave BATNA into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above. 

Connected models: 

  • WATNA: the worst alternative to a negotiated agreement is the other side of this equation. 
  • Opportunity cost: BATNA is essentially the same as opportunity cost, applied to the specific purpose of negotiations. 

Complementary models: 

  • Porter's five forces: particularly as it relates to the bargaining power of suppliers. 
  • Non-violent communication: challenges this model in attempting to find a win-win alternative. 
  • Cialidini’s six principles of persuasion: a powerful option used in conjunction with any negotiation process. 
  • Mutually assured destruction: where the BATNAs result in disaster for both parties, negotiation becomes an imperative. 
  • Cost-benefit analysis: in considering BATNA.
  • Sunk cost fallacy: to support walking away from a protracted, even expensive negotiation. 
Origins & Resources

BATNA was created by negotiation researchers Roger Fisher and William Ury of the Harvard Program on Negotiation and presented in their fundamental 1981 book Getting to Yes: Negotiating Without Giving In.

My Notes

    Nothing here yet. Join ModelThinkers and login to be the first to comment.
Already a ModelThinkers member? Please log in here.

Oops, That’s Members’ Only!

Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.

ModelThinkers membership at a glance:

Small mark
UNLOCK EVERYTHING
Access all mental models and premium content.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR LATTICEWORK
Save models to your personal list.
Small mark
QUICKLY MEMORISE MODELS
Use our Learn function to embed models to memory
Small mark
PERSONALISE MODELS
Add your own notes and reminders.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR ‘EXTERNAL BRAIN’
Discover a new idea? Capture it by adding a new model.
Small mark
JOIN THE MT COMMUNITY
Rate models, comment and access exclusive events.

“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”

Arun Pradhan & Shai Desai
CoFounders, ModelThinkers.

You Might Also Like:

- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.